Home Top News Senate delivers rebuke to Trump by terminating border wall emergency

Senate delivers rebuke to Trump by terminating border wall emergency



President Trump declared a national emergency to free up funding for his border wall between the U.S and Mexico. But declaring a national emergency isn’t new — in fact, the use of emergency powers is older than the country itself.
USA TODAY, Just the FAQs

WASHINGTON – In a major rebuke to President Donald Trump on his signature domestic policy issue, the Republican-controlled Senate on Thursday voted to block the national emergency the president declared to free up money for his border wall. 

A dozen Republicans joined all Democrats backing a resolution to rescind Trump’s effort to tap into more than $6 billion for the wall that had been set aside for other programs, most of them at the Pentagon.  

Trump vowed to use his veto power for the first time to kill the resolution, which passed the House 245-182 last month. There’s not likely enough opposition to override that veto. But the Senate vote was nevertheless a significant political setback for the White House, which had lobbied hard in recent days to keep Republicans in line.

The president responded with a single-word tweet minutes after the vote. 

“VETO!” was all he wrote. 

Republican senators such as Utah’s Mitt Romney and Tennessee’s Lamar Alexander said they supported Trump’s desire to build the wall. But they did not want to set a precedent of the president going around Congress for funding lawmakers had rejected. 

Congress had sent Trump $1.375 billion for the wall this year, far less than what he wanted.  

“Our nation’s founders gave to Congress the power to approve all spending so that the president would not have too much power,” Alexander said. “This check on the executive is a crucial source of our freedom.”

In addition to the political symbolism, the vote could also help opponents challenging Trump’s move in court. Several lawsuits, including one filed Democratic state attorneys general, are another reason some senators wanted Trump to find another path.

“I know the president has the votes to pursue his approach,” Ohio Sen. Rob Portman said shortly before the vote. “But I continue to hope the president uses the funds he has available to him without creating a bad precedent, having some of the needed funds tied up in the courts and taking money from important military projects.”

The political symbolism of Republicans breaking with Trump on his signature domestic issue is enormous. The rebuke puts on display a wedge within the GOP that Democrats are certain to exploit heading into the 2020 election. Many Republican senators noted that they openly criticized President Barack Obama’s use of executive authority, and felt they had to apply that principle consistently to Trump. 


White House officials, including Vice President Mike Pence, scrambled behind the scenes to limit defections. And Trump even signaled on Twitter shortly before the vote that he could be open to limiting a president’s power on future emergencies. In the hand, however, the concession failed to bring wavering Republicans in line.   

“If, at a later date, Congress wants to update the law, I will support those efforts,” Trump posted on Twitter, “but today’s issue is BORDER SECURITY and Crime!!!”

Mitt Romney

Romney, the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, has had a complicated relationship with Trump, whom he publicly criticized during the 2016 election. Trump endorsed Romney’s race for Senate last year to fill the seat left open by the retirement of Orrin Hatch.

“I agree that a physical barrier is urgently needed,” Romney said. “I am seriously concerned that overreach by the executive branch is an invitation to further expansion and abuse by future presidents.”

Lamar Alexander

Alexander had urged Trump for weeks to find a way to access unspent money without taking the controversial step of declaring a national emergency. Though he appeared to be leaning against Trump on the issue, he did not announced his position until just before the vote. 

“I support the president on border security,” Alexander said. But, he said, the emergency “is inconsistent with the U.S. Constitution that I swore an oath to support.”

Roy Blunt

Of the dozen Republican “yes” votes, six serve on the Senate Appropriations Committee, the panel tasked with deciding how taxpayer money is spent. Members on the committee, many of whom have a reputation for bipartisan deal making, arguably had the most to lose from relinquishing spending authority to the president. 

Sen. Blunt, R-Mo., was one of the appropriations members who opposed Trump.

“I think it sets a dangerous precedent and I hope he doesn’t do it,” Blunt told reporters earlier this year.

Rand Paul

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., had voiced objections to the emergency declaration earlier this month. Paul said that approving the declaration would be tantamount to giving “extra-Constitutional powers to the president” – something he said he’s unwilling to do.

Mike Lee

White House officials scrambled behind the scenes to limit defections. A last-ditch effort by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to ease some GOP concerns about presidential emergencies collapsed after the White House rejected it. Lee’s proposal would have terminated some presidential emergencies after 30 days unless Congress affirmatively voted to reauthorize them.

After the talks fell through, Lee announced he would support the resolution. 

Rob Portman 

Portman announced his position in a speech on the Senate floor, arguing that future president could use another national emergency to tear down Trump’s wall. Administration officials had lobbied for Portman’s vote. The senator told reporters in late February he attended a meeting with Pence and Justice Department officials to discuss the president’s emergency

“It doesn’t mean the president can ignore Congress and substitute his will for the will of the people,” Portman said. 

Lisa Murkowski

Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska was one of the relatively early opponents of the emergency declaration. Murkowski does not face re-election until 2022, giving her some additional political cover to oppose a president who remains popular within the GOP.  

“My concern is really about the institution of the Congress,” Murkowski said recently. “The power of the purse rests with the Congress.”

Susan Collins 

Among the Senate’s most outspoken centrist Republicans, Susan Collins of Maine was an early opponent of Trump’s use of an emergency to free up funding for the wall. She was also not swayed by efforts made by some of her GOP colleagues to build support for Trump with a proposal that would have limited the president’s emergency powers in the future.  

That effort, she said, “does not address the current problem that we have, where the president, in my judgment, is usurping Congressional authority to appropriate funds.” 

Jerry Moran

Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kansas, took the unusual step of announcing his decision to oppose Trump by tweeting a photograph of a handwritten statement, including with edit marks.

“The president can advance the building of a wall with the funding just approved by Congress,” Moran wrote on a legal pad, referring to the recently passed legislation that reopened federal agencies after the historic 35-day government shutdown. “The declaration of an emergency is not necessary.”

Marco Rubio

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., had expressed reservations about Trump’s use of an emergency declaration as far back as last month. The onetime presidential candidate and Trump foe has been an on-again, off-again support of Trump’s policies. 

“We have a crisis at our southern border, but no crisis justifies violating the Constitution,” the state’s senior senator said last month. “A future president may use this exact same tactic to impose the Green New Deal.”

Pat Toomey

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., had voiced concern about Trump’s emergency declaration, but didn’t announce he would vote to block it until Thursday.

Toomey, who kept a careful distance from Trump when he ran for re-election in 2016, told Pennsylvania reporters that he supported the president’s underlying goal. But he said he feared Trump’s declaration would pave the way for a future Democratic president issuing a national emergency to combat climate change.

Roger Wicker

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., was among more than a dozen Republican senators who tried to gain support for a bill that would limit presidential emergency declarations. Wicker, who was re-elected to a third term last year, had urged Trump not to declare an emergency, arguing the administration could have pulled money from elsewhere.

“I think there are reprogramming opportunities for him outside of [an] emergency,” said Wicker, known as a defender of Senate traditions. 


Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Contributing: Ledyard King




Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/14/donald-trump-republican-opposition-border-wall-emergency-builds/3156091002/

Read More


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here